1. 

   antonandersonac
   Member

   Youth cleanse also helps in the reduction of excess weight. The general things that are found in most weight loss supplements are that they reduce the calories in our body, but along with that they also reduce the amount of essential vitamins and proteins. But, Youth Cleanse causes weight loss without any causing any loss in our energy levels.

   http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/youth-cleanse-review-risk-free-trial-1861539.html
   http://www.articlesbase.com/wellness-articles/youth-cleanse-review-get-free-trial-1651994.html

   Posted 6 months ago #
2. 

   leone
   Member

   I would like to see the text-shadow function be more easy, now you must type everthing yourself.
   the same system as by a border would be nice,
   So that you you click on the plus icon, and can select the options, in a dropdown list.

   Sorry for my english, i have put a image below for explanation.

   [attachment=1784,124]

   Posted 6 months ago #
3. 

   userbraindamage
   Member

   Agree with all the above..

   PLEASE address this as soon as you can! Once your used to joy of Stylizer, Notepad++ and FTP is a massive ball-ache!

   I've just implemented some -webkit-transitions into my site (http://alexanderjam.es) and now I'm totally unable to use Stylizer without it commenting all the pretty bits out! PITA!

   I at least need to be able to specify exceptions to this rule; it's horrible being restrained by *your* guide!

   aj

   Posted 6 months ago #
4. 

   bobbravo2
   

   Hey Paul,

   Great to see discussion on this topic.

   From what I've read, I can make 2 suggestions:

   • Make cleanser optional (on by default for CSS newbs)
   • Make an interface for adding custom CSS rules to cleanser

   Posted 6 months ago #
5. 

   spiral
   

   oooh, abig enthusiastic yes to both the text-shadow interface and bobbravo's suggestions

   Posted 6 months ago #
6. 

   brewtal
   Member

   i think you should add background-size to stylizer :) - AWESOME software!

   Posted 6 months ago #
7. 

   anderswc
   

   I think I might have posted about the ability to define custom properties before, so I won't go into that, but there's another solution that might be really useful (and a bit easier to implement). What if there was simply the ability to insert a property that isn't predefined. Say I want to use a fancy new property called "foo" that BrowserX supports. Rather than waiting for you to consider adding that property to Stylizer, I should be able to enter it in the property name field. Then when Stylizer can't find that property in it's predefined list, it should give me a plain text box to enter the value, rather than screaming at me to change the property name. This seems like a much more intelligent system to me.

   Posted 6 months ago #
8. 

   Skybound_Paul
   Key Master

   It's looking like we're going to do something like this for now:

   1) Add a whole bunch of CSS properties to the property list.
   2) Allow pass-through validation of every CSS property. So, if you type "my-super-property", it will give you the same warning that "my-super-property" is invalid, but it will give you the option to accept it anyways. We'll also make the UI efficient for this as well (obviously)...such as, pressing Tab a second time automatically accepts the property. Stylizer will also place a special marker in the underlying CSS file to stop Cleanser from complaining when you try to load a style sheet that uses one of these weirdo properties.

   Posted 6 months ago #
9. 

   asenseofdesign
   Member

   YAY! Those are really good news. Thanks!

   Posted 6 months ago #
10. 

    bobbravo2
    

    THANK YOU PAUL & ANDREW FOR LISTENING TO YOUR CUSTOMERS

    Keep it up & you'll have loyal customers for life :-)

    Posted 6 months ago #
11. 

    keld
    Member

    Any idea when a new version of Stylizer will be available with css 3 support? because right now I have to use stylizer for the css then open my old css editor to re-edit it to add css3 features.
    Dont forget the suppport for all -moz- -webkit-

    Thanks!
    Otherwise great software, love it.

    Posted 5 months ago #
12. 

    jacobharry114
    Member

    http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/brand-new-acai-review-how-effective-brand-new-acai-is-1970929.html
    http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/brand-new-acai-review-does-brand-new-acai-really-work-1964707.html

    Posted 5 months ago #
13. 

    topspeed
    Member

    I've just implemented some -webkit-transitions into my site (http://alexanderjam.es) and now I'm totally unable to use Stylizer without it commenting all the pretty bits out! PITA! http://methoo.com methoo.com

    Posted 4 months ago #
14. 

    userbraindamage
    Member

    Come on guys, this is WAY overdue. Completely defeats the object of Stylizer.

    Posted 4 months ago #
15. 

    seutje
    Member

    bow-shadow is back in the spec -> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#box-shadow

    it seems that currently Stylizer does support -webkit-box-shadow, but mot -moz-box-shadow or box shadow, which is pretty silly imo since Stylizer is recognized as a moz browser
    also, it seems that none of the transform properties are supported (transform, -moz-transform, -webkit-transform)

    these things would be no problem at all, if there was a way to not have it comment it out. For instance if I had the ability to add arbitrary properties that are allowed to slip through the validation

    it's nice that this thing validates, but it would be even nicer if it would allow me to choose if I want something commented out or not

    Posted 3 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.